Pritam Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36541 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-60 Year-2025 Thana- GOGRI District- Khagaria ====================================================== 1.

Pritam Kumar Yadav son of Late Chandradeo Yadav Resident of Village -Ratan PS -Gogri District- Khagaria 2.

Ashish Kumar Yadav @ Ashish Kumar Son of Pankaj Yadav Resident of Village - Taufir Nayagaun, PS -Gogri District- Khagaria 3.

Primtam Das @ Pritam Kumar Son of Rajendra Das Resident of Village - Bhojua, PS -Gogri District- Khagaria ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rahul Singh For the State :

Mr. Bishweshwar Ram ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 25-11-2025 Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this anticipatory bail petition in respect of petitioner no. 2.

2. Permission is granted. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail petition is dismissed as withdrawn with respect to petitioner no. 2.

3. The petitioner nos. 1 and 3 apprehend their arrest in connection with Gogri P.S. Case No. 60 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 303(2), 352, 3(5) of the BNS, 2023.

4. As per allegation, the petitioners along with some

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36541 of 2025(4) dt.25-11-2025 2/2 unknown accused persons assaulted the informant on his left eye with butt and took away Rs. 20,000/- from his pocket.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. It has further been submitted that there is no specific allegation attributed against the petitioners rather there is general and omnibus allegation against them. It has further been submitted that from perusal of the injury report, it appears that injury was found to be simple in nature caused by hard and blunt substance.

6. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

7. Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioner nos. 1 and 3, in the event of their arrest or surrender within four weeks before the learned court below, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Khagaria in connection with Gogri P.S. Case No. 60 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C./ 482(2) of the BNSS, 2023. (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) priyanka/- U T