Ramavtar Yadav @ Ram Autar Yadav @ Mishra v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40901 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-107 Year-2025 Thana- BAHERI District- Darbhanga ====================================================== Ramavtar Yadav @ Ram Autar Yadav @ Mishra S/o Mahindra Yadav @ Mahendra Yadav R/o Village- Sher, P.S.- Baheri, District- Darbhanga ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pramod Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ram Sumiran Rai, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 20-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 76, 303(2), 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner assaulted with iron rod on the head of the informant due to which he received injury.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that from perusal of the injury report of the informant, it will transpire that there is no repetition of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40901 of 2025(3) dt.20-08-2025 2/2 rod blow and doctor has opined that the nature of injury is simple. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 04.04.2025.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State and learned counsel for the informant have vehemently opposed the prayer of regular bail. It has further been submitted by learned counsel for the informant that the petitioner is having criminal antecedent of six cases and the injury is on the vital part of the informant.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Baheri P.S. Case No. 107 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-VII, Darbhanga. (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Shubham/- U T