Patna High CourtMJC/4320/2009disposed

Mukti Nath Singh v. Raghubir Rai And ORS

2015-12-022 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4320 of 2009 ====================================================== Mukti Nath Singh son of Sri Shubh Narayan Singh, resident of villageEnayatpur, Tole-Pilue, P.O.- P.S.- Daudpur, District- Saran (Chapra) (Defendant)- Petitioner

Versus

1. Raghubir Rai, Son of Late Shiv Rai.

2. Satya Bhagwan Rai alias Satish Kumar Rai, Son of Bidyarthi Rai.

3. Jai Bahadur Rai, Son of Bidyarthi Rai.

4. Dwarika Rai, Son of Bidyarthi Rai.

5. Vijay Bahadur Rai, Son of Ram Pravesh Rai.

6. Hari Shankar Rai, Son of Satya Bhagwan Rai. All residents of village- Khalpur Kamla Tole- Lav-Kushpur, Pargna-Chrand, P.S. Chapra Mufassil, District- Saran (Chapra) .... .... (Plaintiffs)- Opposite Party 1st set.

7. Awadhesh Kumar Singh Son of Sri Shubh Narayan Singh.

8. Ajay Kumar Singh, Son of Ram Bahadur Singh. Both residents of village Enayatpur, Tole-Pilue, P.O.- P.S.- Daudpur, District- Saran (Chapra)

9. Tribhuvan Rai son of late Satya Narayan Rai, resident of village- Beldari, P.O. & P.S.- Daudpur, District- Saran (Chapra)

10. Arjun Rai son of late Satya Narayan Rai.

11. Bhim Rai son of late Satya Narayan Rai.

12. Nakul Rai son of late Satya Narayan Rai.

13. Sahdeo Rai son of late Satya Narayan Rai.

14. Suresh Rai son of late Satya Narayan Rai.

15. Ram Kisun Rai son of Hira Rai.

All residents of village Beldari, P.O. & P.S.- Daudpur, DistrictSaran (Chapra). ....... (Defendants) Opposite Party 2ndset.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL ORDER 02-12-2015 Perused the office note.

It appears that Civil Revision No. 2150 of 2006 stood dismissed for non-compliance of the order dated 24.11.2009. However, the office has reported that, later on, the petitioner was

Patna High Court MJC No.4320 of 2009 (2) dt.02-12-2015 directed to convert the civil revision application into a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India within the time prescribed, failing which the application would finally stand rejected as not maintainable. That direction having not been complied, the aforesaid Civil Revision application stood rejected as not maintainable and, as such, the present application has become infructuous.

Accordingly, this application stands dismissed as infructuous.

(Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J) SC/- U