Dharamraj Kumar @ Dharmraj Ravidas v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39060 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-569 Year-2025 Thana- RAHUI District- Nalanda ====================================================== Dharamraj Kumar @ Dharmraj Ravidas son of Ashok Ravidas Resident of Village- Amba PS- Rahui (Bhaganbigha) Dist- Nalanda ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
Neelam Devi Wife of Ajay Das Resident of village- and Post- Mahmadpur, PS- Asthawa, Dist- Nalanda ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate For the State :
Mrs. Nirmala Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 17-06-2026 Heard the parties.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Rahui (Bhaganbigha) P.S. Case No. 569 of 2025 registered for the offence under Sections 117(2), 303(2), 109(1), 352 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, lodged on 28.09.2025 by the informant, Neelam Devi.
3. As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged that while she was sitting and Chandrakant Ravidas came her house for taking motorcycle, an altercation took place with the petitioner which led him to threw the motorcycle in the drain and assaulted by giving iron rod on the head. She was shifted to the hospital which followed the F.I.R.
2/4
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is case and counter case, an exaggerated F.I.R. is there, both sides have suffered and the injuries have been found to be simple in nature. Last submission is that without accepting the allegation or outcome of the present petition, the petitioners intend to pay Rs.3,000/- to the informant towards treatment by Demand Draft issued by the local branch of the State Bank of India/any Nationalized Bank to be submitted at the time of execution of bail bond.
5. Learned APP opposes the prayer though there is case and counter case, allegation against this petitioner is of inflicting injuries.
6. Considering the submissions of the parties as also that the injuries have been found to be simple in nature, there is case and counter case, in that background, this Court is inclined to extend him the privilege of anticipatory bail subject to payment of Rs.3,000/- to the informant as undertaken by the learned counsel for the petitioners through Demand Draft issued by the local branch of the State Bank of India/Nationalized Bank to be submitted at the time of execution of the bail bond and after checking credentials to be handed over to the informant.
3/4
7. Let the petitioner be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from the receipt of this order, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda at Biharsharif, in connection with Rahui (Bhaganbigha) P.S. Case No. 569 of 2025 subject to the following conditions:- (i) one of the bailor should be the family member/relative of the petitioner who shall provide official document (Aadhar Card/Voter Id/Driving License/Pan Card) to show his/her bona fide;
(ii) the petitioner shall be appearing before the Police Station as and when required for cooperating in the investigation;
(iii) the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his/her bail bond by the Trial Court itself;
(iv) the petitioner shall appear before the concerned police station every month for next six months to mark his attendance and at the end of the period a certificate be submitted before the Trial Court failing which the State shall be at liberty
4/4 to take steps for cancellation of bail bonds; (v) the petitioner shall in no way try to induce or promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail bonds;
(vi) the petitioner shall desist from committing any criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of bail bonds. (Rajiv Roy, J) vinayak/- U T