← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/1175/2021disposed

Mithlesh Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2024-03-15Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1175 of 2021 ====================================================== Mithlesh Kumar Singh Son of Sri Ram Khelawan Singh Resident of VillageMajhauli, P.S.- Bidupur, District- Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

The District Collector, Vaishali at Hajipur.

3.

Mohamad Firoj Son of Late Abdul Rajak Resident of Village- Bidupur, P.O.- Bidupur, P.S.- Bidupur, District- Vaishali.

4.

Mohamad Farukh Son of Late Abdul Rajak Resident of Village- Bidupur, P.O.- Bidupur, P.S.- Bidupur, District- Vaishali. 5.

Mohamad Farid Son of Late Abdul Rajak Resident of Village- Bidupur, P.O.- Bidupur, P.S.- Bidupur, District- Vaishali. 6.

Mohamad Nisar Son of Late Mohamad Harun Resident of Village- Bidupur, P.O.- Bidupur, P.S.- Bidupur, District- Vaishali. 7.

Anil Kumar Singh Son of Sri Ram Babu Yadav Resident of MohallaChakaram (Srikrishna Nagar), P.O.- Kidwaipuri, P.S. Buddha Colony, Patna, District- Patna.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Rishi Raj Sinha, SC -19 Mr. Saurabh Kumar AC to SC 19 For the Intervenor :

Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 15-03-2024 Ref : I.A. No. 1/2024 The aforesaid interlocutory application has been preferred for impleading Mithelesh Kumar Singh as intervenorrespondent.

2. There is no objection from the either of the side.

3. Accordingly Interlocutory Application No. 1/24 stands allowed.

Patna High Court CWJC No.1175 of 2021(8) dt.15-03-2024 2/2 C.W.J.C. No. 1175 of 2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, State as also learned counsel for the Intervenor.

2. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to agitate the matter before an appropriate forum.

3. Such liberty is always available to the aggrieved person.

4. The writ petition stands disposed of.

(Rajiv Roy, J) Jagdish/- U