← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./43986/2024bail granted

Amarjeet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2024-08-01Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43986 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-169 Year-2023 Thana- MEHSI District- East Champaran ====================================================== Amarjeet Kumar Son of Hazari Sahani R/O Vill.- Uzilpur, P.S.- Mehsi, Dist.- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Prateek Tandon For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Arun Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 01-08-2024

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 337, 338, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that her father-in-law had performed two marriages and had three male and two female children from second wife and informant is wife of son from first marriage of her father-in-law who passed away, further informant demanded a share in the property, but she was denied on the ground that she is wife of the son from the first wife who is no more and thereafter it is alleged that Kala Devi grabbed the hair of the informant and slammed her on the ground while Anita Devi gave lathi blows and Amarjeet assaulted the informant by bricks and stone.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that from

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43986 of 2024(2) dt.01-08-2024 2/2 perusal of the allegation as alleged in the F.I.R., it would manifest that on account of property dispute, the instant FIR came to be instituted. It is also submitted that petitioner is step brother-in-law of the informant and the injury suffered by the injured is simple in nature.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Mehsi P.S. Case No. 169 of 2023 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

7. Accordingly, the instant anticipatory bail application stands allowed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T