← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/8282/2016disposed

Rajendra Ram v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-04-16Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8282 of 2016 ====================================================== Rajendra Ram S/o- Late Sonelal Ram, R/o- Village- Tonadpur, P.O.- Pastara, P.s.- Paligaon, District- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Primary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna

2. The District Magistrate, Vaishali at Hazipur

3. The District Education Officer, Vaishali at Hazipur

4. The Block Education Officer, Patelpur, Vaishali

5. The District Programme Officer (Estab.) Vaishali at Hazipur

6. The Block Development Officer, Patepur, Vaishali

7. Presiding Officer, District Appellate Tribunal, Vaishali

8. The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj- Khoajpur Basti, Patepur, Vaishali

9. The Panchayat Secretary, Khoajpur Basti, Patepur, Vaishali

10. Prema Nand S/o- Late Ganga Choudhary, R/o Village- Imadpur, P.O.- Pastara, P.S.- Baligaon, District- Vaishali ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dharmendra Kumar Paswan, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Rakesh Ambastha, AC to AAG-05 For Resp. No. 10 :

Mr. Shashibhushan, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 16-04-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

In view of the fact that the State Appellate Authority is now functional, the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition in order to file an appeal before the State Appellate Authority.

Permission is granted.

In case the petitioner files an appeal before the State Appellate Authority within a period of one month from today

Patna High Court CWJC No.8282 of 2016(2) dt.16-04-2018 2/2 along with a copy of this order, the State Appellate Authority is required to decide the appeal on its own merit after condoning the delay in filing the appeal in view of the fact that the petitioner was pursuing the writ petition for the same relief before this Court.

With the aforesaid liberty, the writ petition stands disposed of.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) spandey/- U