← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./37123/2026bail granted

Karan Kumar @ Karan Sao v. The State Of Bihar

2026-06-15Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37123 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-54 Year-2026 Thana- JAMUI District- Jamui ====================================================== 1.

Karan Kumar @ Karan Sao S/O Surendra Prasad Sao @ Surendra Pd. Saw Resident of Village- Nimarang, Ward No. 30, P.O and P.S.- Jamui, DistrictJamui. 2.

Niraj Kumar @ Niraj Barnwal S/O Mahesh Prasad Modi R/O VillageBodhwan Talab, P.O. and P.S- Jamui, Distt.- Jamui. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pankaj Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ganesh Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 15-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Jamui P.S. Case No. 54 of 2026 registered for the offence under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 109, 308(4), 333, 352, 351(2), 308(5) of the B.N.S.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioners along with others, were running a tea shop in front of the informant's shop, which gave rise to a dispute and in the course thereof, the injured was allegedly assaulted by the petitioners and others.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37123 of 2026(2) dt.15-06-2026 2/3

4. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are innocent and they have falsely been implicated in this case. It is next submitted that there is general and omnibus allegations against the petitioners. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioners are ready to give an undertaking that they will not run a tea shop in front of the shop of the informant. Petitioner no. 1 has one criminal antecedent and petitioner no. 2 has clean antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts, this application is allowed.

7. Let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the concerned Court below within four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Jamui/ concerned Court below in connection with Jamui P.S. Case No. 54 of 2026, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 / Section 482 of the BNSS.

8. This is also subject to the condition that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37123 of 2026(2) dt.15-06-2026 3/3 petitioners shall not operate any tea shop in front of the informant's shop. If the petitioners are found to be continuing the operation of the said tea shop, their bail bonds shall not be accepted by the court below.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) tusharika/- U T