Smt. Rita Sinha v. Mosm. Urmila Devi

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.641 of 2023 ====================================================== 1.

Smt. Rita Sinha Wife of Late Arun Kumar Sinha Present resident of Flat no. A/51, Kankarbagh Colony, P.S.-Kankarbagh, Town and District-Patna, PIN 800020.

2.

Vishal Sinha Son of Late Binay Kumar Sinha Present resident of Flat no. A/51, Kankarbagh Colony, P.S.-Kankarbagh, Town and District-Patna, PIN 800020.

3.

Ashish Vinay Son of Late Binay Kumar Sinha Present resident of Flat no. A/51, Kankarbagh Colony, P.S.-Kankarbagh, Town and District-Patna, PIN 800020.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

Mosm. Urmila Devi Wife of Late Shyamdeo Singh Resident of 3/97, LIG, Hanuman Nagar, Kankarbagh, P.S.-Patrakar Nagar, District-Patna, PIN800020 2.

Mohit Sinha Son of Late Shyamdeo Singh Resident of 3/97, LIG, Hanuman Nagar, Kankarbagh, P.S.-Patrakar Nagar, District-Patna, PIN-800020 3.

Rohit Singh Son of Late Shyamdeo Singh Resident of 3/97, LIG, Hanuman Nagar, Kankarbagh, P.S.-Patrakar Nagar, District-Patna, PIN-800020 4.

Ms. Garima Sinha Daughter of Late Binay KUmar Sinha at Present Resident of Flat No. A/51, Kankarbagh Colony, P.S.-Kankarbagh, Town and DistrictPatna PIN-800020. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajeev Prakash, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 05-10-2023 Mr. Sidharth Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioners prays for and is granted permission to withdraw this application.

2. This application is dismissed as withdrawn.

3. The Eviction Suit No. 89 of 2012 pending in the court of learned Sub-Judge-VIII, Patna must be decided within three months of receipt/communication of a copy of this order.

Patna High Court C.Misc. No.641 of 2023(2) dt.05-10-2023 2/2 The court below will also file a compliance report to this Court after three months.

4. The court below will proceed ex parte against noncooperating party. The court below will not automatically stay the proceeding of the Eviction Suit No. 89 of 2012 if against any interim order either of the parties moves this Court.

5. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the District Judge, Patna for its compliance through FAX and e-mail forthwith.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) Harsh/ U