Chandrahas Kumar Yadav @ Chandrahas Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35653 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-28 Year-2019 Thana- BAHERI District- Darbhanga ====================================================== 1.

CHANDRAHAS KUMAR YADAV @ CHANDRAHAS YADAV Son of Arun Yadav Resident of Village- Nandapatti, P.S.- Beheri, DistrictDarbhanga. 2.

Arun Yadav @ Arun Kumar Yadav Son of Mishrilal Yadav Both Resident of Village- Nandapatti, P.S.- Beheri, District- Darbhanga. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shailendra Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Akshay Lal Pandit ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 06-09-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Baheri P.S.Case No.28 of 2019 (CRI 392/2019) registered for offences punishable under Sections 384 and 387/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation as per the FIR is that the informant received phone calls from Mobile No.9771502109 and 8709995783 demanding rangdari and from the voice, it appears that it is the voice of one Chandrahas Yadav and he again received phone calls from those numbers, which was taped by the informant also and as such he suspected the hands of the petitioners. Apart from that it appears that from the petition as well as the supplementary affidavit that the petitioner no.2 is accused in two more cases.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that they have falsely been implicated in this case as the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35653 of 2019(4) dt.06-09-2019 2/2 petitioners are supplier of the soil and the money was due , which has not been given. It has also been submitted that para 32 of the case diary discloses that on inquiry of the CDR it was found that no talk was made between the petitioner and the informant.

Heard learned A.P.P. and the learned counsel for the informant , who has opposed the prayer for bail.. Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioners surrender before the learned court below within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of the order and on surrender they shall be released on bail till submission of the chage- sheet and during that period, they have to appear before the police and cooperate in the investigation, however, once after investigation if any serious incriminating materials come against these petitioners and charge-sheet is submitted, they have to surrender and pray for regular bail.

With the aforesaid direction, this application is disposed of.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T