← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./37445/2026bail granted

Sanjay Kumar Paswan @ Sanjay Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2026-06-16Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar Verma3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37445 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-216 Year-2026 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Rohtas ====================================================== Sanjay Kumar Paswan @ Sanjay Paswan S/o Sri Bhagwan Paswan Resident of Village- Khadihan, P.S - Baddi, District - Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shashi Kant, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Suman Kumari Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 16-06-2026 Heard Mr. Shashi Kant, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Suman Kumari Singh, learned APP for the State.

2. Petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since 23.04.2026, in connection with Excise Case No. 1128 of 2026 read with Sasaram Excise Case No. 216 of 2026, F.I.R. dated 22.04.2026 registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act.

3. Recovery is of 110 litres of illicit country made liquor.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. He further submits that it appears from the F.I.R. as well as seizure list that nothing has been recovered from the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37445 of 2026(2) dt.16-06-2026 2/3 conscious possession of the petitioner rather recovery has been made from the place of occurrence and petitioner has been made accused in the present case merely on the basis of suspicion and petitioner has no concern at all with the alleged recovery of illicit liquor or the motorcycle in question. The petitioner is in custody since 23.04.2026.

5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that the petitioner carries one more case of similar nature other than the present one but fairly submits on the basis of paragraph-3 of the bail petition that the petitioner is on bail in the pending matter.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special Judge, Excise Court No.1, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Excise Case No. 1128 of 2026 read with Sasaram Excise Case No. 216 of 2026, subject to the following conditions :-

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37445 of 2026(2) dt.16-06-2026 3/3 properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witness, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(3) And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedents, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Ibrar//- U T