Patna High CourtCR. MISC./40802/2024dismissed

Malkhan Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2024-07-19Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40802 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-313 Year-2023 Thana- GHORASAHAN District- East Champaran ====================================================== Malkhan Singh S/O Jai Narayan Singh R/O Hasanpur Bairiya, P.S. Kundwechainpur, Distt-East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Krishna Kant Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anil Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 19-07-2024 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Ghorasahan P.S. Case No. 313 of 2023 registered under Section 392 of the IPC.

3. Earlier the bail of the petitioner was rejected vide order dated 10.01.2024 in Cr. Misc. No. 83765 of 2023 which reads as follows:- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 07.06.2023 in connection with Ghorasahan P.S. Case No. 313 of 2023 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and others are accused of looting a C.S.P. Centre.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40802 of 2024(2) dt.19-07-2024 2/2

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and nothing incriminating has been recovered from his possession. He next submits that the petitioner has not been put on T.I.P.

5. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail. He submits that the materials have come to connect the petitioner with the alleged crime including the confessional statements and the recovery. The petitioner has criminal antecedents also.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. It is, accordingly, rejected.

7. The trial is directed to be expedited.

4. No ground for review is made out.

5. Accordingly, this application is dismissed. (Sandeep Kumar, J) Guddu/- U T