Patna High CourtMJC/377/2018disposed

Yogesh Sharma v. The State Of Bihar Through Sri Prem Singh Meena, The Principal Secretary, Department Of Welfare, Go

2018-12-19Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.377 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4274 of 2016 ====================================================== Yogesh Sharma, Son of Late Brij Nandan Singh, Resident of Mohalla- Vishnu Vihar (near Jagjeewan College), Manpur, Police Station- Muffasil, DistrictGaya. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Sri Prem Singh Meena, the Principal Secretary, Department of Welfare, Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna.

2. Sri Virendra Prasad Yadav, the Under Secretary, Department of Welfare (SC/ST) Govt. pf Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna.

3. Sri Virendra Kumar, the Director, Department of Welfare, Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna.

4. Sri Harendra Srivastava, the Deputy Director, Welfare Magadh Division, Gaya.

5. Sri Surendra Ram, the District Welfare, Gaya. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Kundan Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Gyan Prakash Ojha, GA- 7 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 19-12-2018 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties submits that payment in terms of the direction of this Court has been made.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has to ascertain from his client whether payment has been made or not?

Since the stand has been taken on affidavit, the Court has reason to believe that the deponent has rightly made that statement.

Patna High Court MJC No.377 of 2018(4) dt.19-12-2018 2/2 Considering the aforesaid, the present proceeding is dropped.

The Treasury Officer is under obligation to ensure payment of the dues of the petitioner at the earliest. In the event, the statement made in the show-cause is found to be false and payment is not cleared by the Treasury Officer, the petitioner would be at liberty to file application for revival of the present contempt application.

With the aforesaid, this application stands disposed of. (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) uday/- U