Yaduni Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36714 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-8 Year-2025 Thana- DHAUDAD District- Rohtas ====================================================== Yaduni Ram, aged about 78 years, Male, S/O Late Bipat Ram, R/O VillageDhankara, Kuradavan, PO and PS- Dhaudand (PS- Sasaram (M) old), District- Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ashwani Kumar Tiwary, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Prem Kumar Jha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 18-06-2025 Heard Mr. Ashwani Kumar Tiwary, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Prem Kumar Jha, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in connection with Dhaudadh P.S. Case No. 08/2025 registered for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. As per the allegation made in the FIR, 46 litres of illicit liquor was recovered from a Toto vehicle bearing Registration No.BR-24-ER-4171.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. Admittedly, at the time of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36714 of 2025(2) dt.18-06-2025 2/3 the alleged seizure and recovery of illicit liquor, petitioner was not present and he has been made accused in this case, being the owner of the vehicle in question, which was given by the petitioner to co-accused/driver Raja Babu to bring the passenger and the same was being driven by him at the time of said incidence and as such the petitioner had no idea that said Raja Babu was carrying liquor on the said vehicle. Petitioner has clean antecedent.

5. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail.

6. Considering the nature of allegation made against the petitioner in the FIR and also the fact that petitioner has clean antecedent, I am of the opinion that petitioner has, prima facie, made out a case to be released on pre-arrest bail.

7. The petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on pre-arrest bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned District Court within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special Excise Court No.2, Sasaram, Rohtas / Concerned Court in connection with Dhaudadh P.S. Case No. 08/2025, subject to the conditions as

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36714 of 2025(2) dt.18-06-2025 3/3 laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

8. The learned District Court is directed to verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and if it is found that the petitioner is involved in some other cases, as what has been stated in paragraph no.3 of the bail application, this order will automatically lose its force.

(Purnendu Singh, J) Sanjay/- U T