Sanjay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42143 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2688 Year-2022 Thana- PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPatna ====================================================== SANJAY KUMAR SON OF SRI SHYAM NARAIN SAO R/O- ASSAM GUEST HOUSE, ASHOK RAJ PATH, P.S.- PIRBAHORE, DISTRICTPATNA ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
PIYUSH KUMAR SON OF SHREE UPENDRA NATH SINGH R/O- B.M. DAS ROAD, PURENDERPUR, P.O.- BAKIPUR, P.S.- PIRBAHOR, DISTT.- PATNA ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Tilak Sao For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Anuj Kumar Shrivastava ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 25-07-2024
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 406 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the dispute is monetary and the petitioner has cleared all the dues and thereafter a compromise has been entered in between the parties.
4. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42143 of 2024(2) dt.25-07-2024 2/2
5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Complaint Case No.2688© of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.
6. However, the learned trial court before accepting the bail bond of the petitioner shall verify from the complainant whether a compromise has been entered in between the parties or not and in the event if the complainant disputes the compromise in that event the present anticipatory bail order shall not be given effect to.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) amit/- U T