← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./42134/2023allowed

Rakesh Kumar @ Rakesh Sahni v. The State Of Bihar

2023-07-14Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42134 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-19 Year-2016 Thana- LALGANJ District- Vaishali ====================================================== RAKESH KUMAR @ RAKESH SAHNI Son of Ramadhar Sahni R/O Village - Bilanpur, P.S.- Lalganj, District - Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Manish Chandra Gandhi For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Surendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 14-07-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 323, 324, 307, 341, 379, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The allegation against the petitioner along with others is of assaulting the informant, due to which he sustained injury. It is further alleged that the other co-accused snatched the bag of the informant, in which laptop and a golden chain were kept. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case due to old dispute. He has committed no offence. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. As per supplementary injury report, it appears that the injury sustained to the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42134 of 2023(2) dt.14-07-2023 2/2 informant by this petitioner is simple in nature. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail petition. He is languishing in judicial custody since 03.04.2023. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as period of custody, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court concerned in connection with Lalganj P.S. Case No. 19 of 2016.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) arish/- U T