Patna High CourtCR. MISC./36694/2025bail rejected

Raushan Kumar @ Raushan Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2025-08-06Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36694 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-708 Year-2023 Thana- NAGAR District- Vaishali ====================================================== Raushan Kumar @ Raushan Kumar Singh S/O Narendra Prasad Singh R/O village- Dighi Kala East, PS- Hajipur Sadar, District- vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, Adv.

Mrs. Vaishnavi Singh, Adv.

Mr. Ritwik Thakur, Adv, For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Madhuri Lata, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 06-08-2025 Heard Learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Hajipur Nagar P.S. Case No.708 of 2023 lodged under Sections 302/34 of the IPC read with Section 27 of the Arms Act pending the court of Addl. District and Sessions Judge-IX, Vaishali at Hajipur.

3. As per the prosecution, the FIR has been lodged against unknown persons against whom there is allegation of killing the informant's nephew by gun shot.

4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He submits that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and the FIR has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36694 of 2025(3) dt.06-08-2025 2/2 been lodged against unknown persons. He further submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case and his name has figured in the present case only on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused persons.

5. Learned Counsel also submits that the petitioner is in custody since 18.09.2024 and his antecedent is not clean. There are 6 criminal cases pending against him.

6. Counsel for the petitioner submits that charge-sheet has been filed and charge has already been framed in this case.

7. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that in the present case, not only confession is there rather corroboration is also there. The vehicle used in the crime, cartridges and arms were also recovered.

8. In the present facts and circumstances, this Court is not inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioner, therefore the bail application of the petitioner is hereby rejected. (Dr. Anshuman, J.) Prakashmani/- U T