Anamika Mahaseth v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.331 of 2015 Arising out of Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 8089 of 2014 Along with Interlocutory Application No.1534 of 2015 ====================================================== Anamika Mahaseth, W/o Sri Sunil Kumar, Mohalla - Pandasarai M/S - Mohit Industries, Mill at Muhalla - Pandasanga, P.O. & P.S. Laherisarai, District - Darbhanga.

.... .... Appellant/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through Principal Secretary, Food and Consumer Protection Department, State of Bihar, Patna.

2. The District Collector/Magistrate, Darbhanga.

3. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Hilsa, District - Darbhanga.

4. Bihar State Foods and Civil Supplies Corporation Limited, through its Chairman.

5. The District Manager, Bihar State Food and Civil Supply Corporation Ltd., Darbhanga.

6. The Certificate officer Cum Addl. Collector, Darbhanga. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant : None For the Respondents -State : Mr. Mithilesh Kumar Pathak, S.C.7 For the respondents- BSFC : Mr. Anjani Kumar, A.A.G.-6 Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA And HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA) 04-05-2016 None appears for the appellant.

Re.: Interlocutory Application No.1534 of 2015 The application is for condonation of delay of 118 days in filing of the appeal.

For the reasons mentioned in the application, we find that sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay.

Patna High Court LPA No.331 of 2015 (2) dt.04-05-2016 2/2 Consequently, the delay of 118 days in filing of the appeal is condoned.

Interlocutory Application stands allowed accordingly.

Re.: Letters Patent Appeal No.331 of 2015 The present Letters Patent Appeal is directed against an order passed by the learned Single Bench whereby the appellant has withdrawn the writ application. In view of the withdrawal of the writ application by the appellant, we do not find that the appellant can be permitted to dispute the withdrawal in the present Letters Patent Appeal. The Letters Patent Appeal is, thus, dismissed. (Hemant Gupta, J.) (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.) Sunil/- U