← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./41499/2026dismissed

Manarul @ Md. Manarul Haque @ Manarul Haque v. The State Of Bihar

2026-06-25Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41499 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-195 Year-2025 Thana- DIGHALBANK District- Kishanganj ====================================================== Manarul @ Md. Manarul Haque @ Manarul Haque S/o Abdul Barik R/o Village - Pipla Ward no. 17, P.S. - Dighalbank, Dist. - Kishanganj. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Dilip Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Satya Nand Shukla, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 25-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Dighalbank P.S. Case No.195 of 2025 registered for the offence under sections 137(2) and 140(1) of the B.N.S., 2023.

3.

Initially, the F.I.R. was registered against unknown persons under sections 137(2) and 140(1) of the B.N.S., 2023, but subsequently, it has come during investigation that the deceased was the husband of the informant, who used to abuse and assault the informant. One Daras, the brother of the informant, is said to have killed the deceased along with this petitioner, which has come during the self-inculpatory statement of said Daras.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41499 of 2026(2) dt.25-06-2026 2/2 4.

The petitioner is in custody since 29.11.2025.

5.

Considering the nature of allegation levelled against the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, this bail application is rejected. 6.

It is, however, clarified that the observations made herein are limited to the adjudication of the present bail application and shall not prejudice the case of the petitioner at any subsequent stage of the trial and this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. (Sandeep Kumar, J) pawan/- U T