Budhan Yadav And ORS v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.39083 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -750 Year- 2013 Thana -SERGHATI COMPLAINT CASE DistrictGAYA ======================================================
1. Budhan Yadav son of Punai Yadav
2. Raj Kumar Yadav son of Buddhan Yadav
3. Kabutri Devi wife of Buddhan Yadav All resident of village - Mokha, P.S. Dumaria, Distt. - Gaya .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Gudiya Devi D/o Chanarik Yadav resident of village - Madarpur, P.S. Dumaria, Distt. - Gaya .... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. S. Jamil Akhtar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Renuka Ratnakar(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER 13-03-2015 Heard the parties.
The petitioners are father -in-law, brother-in-law and mother-in -law respectively of the complainant. They seek anticipatory bail in complaint case no. 750 of 2013 instituted under Sections 498A of the IPC and Section 3⁄4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
Contention of the petitioners is that admittedly the marriage had been solemnized in 2007. The main allegation is against the husband.
In view of the above, let the petitioners, named above, in the event of their arrest/surrender within four weeks
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.39083 of 2014 (2) dt.13-03-2015 2/2 from today before the Court below, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M. Sherghati, Gaya in connection with complaint case no. 750 of 2013 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors in each case shall be the own/close family member of the petitioners.
(ii) As soon as the charges are framed the petitioners shall appear in person before the trial Court on the date(s) fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates trial Court shall have liberty to cancel their bail bonds and secure their arrest in accordance with law.
(Kishore Kumar Mandal, J) Shyam/- U T