← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/10126/2022dismissed

Anuradha Singh @ Anuradha Ravindra Pratap Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2023-04-28Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10126 of 2022 ====================================================== Anuradha Singh @ Anuradha Ravindra Pratap Singh Daughter of Sri Ravindra Pratap Singh Resident of Village- Babhandih, P.S.- Wazirganj, District- Gaya, at present residing at near Chs Link Road Oshiwara, Andheri, District- Mumbai.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, rural works Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Engineer in Chief, Rural Works Department, Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Executive Engineer, rural works department, works division, Gaya. 4.

The Junior Engineer, Rural Works Department, Works Division, Gaya. 5.

The Circle Officer, Wazirganj, District- Gaya. 6.

Pawan Kumar, Government Contractor of Project, Resident of North Lakhibagh, Janakpur, Manpur, District- Gaya.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ajay Kumar Jain For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Ajay (Ga5) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 28-04-2023 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs:- "1(a). For shifting the road bridge appropriate place as at per the alignment at river front relating to the rural road "BabhandihMahadalit Tola to 3 NH road project" of the Govt. of Bihar which is at present being constructed at a wrong place about 400' far from the river front near the land of the petitioner and there is apprehension of damage to the land of the petitioner due to deviation in the river flow due to unauthorized

Patna High Court CWJC No.10126 of 2022(2) dt.28-04-2023 2/2 construction.

(b). For payment of appropriate compensation to the petitioner for the unauthorized cutting of about 1500 tractor trolley soil from the land of the petitioner by the respondent construction firm without any permission and the land property of the petitioner has been damaged which is a fertile agriculture cum commercial land having area 2.22 Acre bearing khata No.

96, Khesra No. 770, Thana No. 611, Village Babhandih, District-Gaya."

At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to approach the Respondent authorities for redresal of her aforesaid grievances. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Ajay/- U