Madhu Kumari v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42273 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1065 Year-2024 Thana- NALANDA COMPLAINT CASE District- Nalanda ====================================================== Madhu Kumari Daughter of Shishir Kumar @ Dayanand Sao Resident of village- Malti Ka Tola, Mustafapur, Po- Malti, PS- Asthawan DistrictNalanda Bihar 803107 ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
Shobha Devi Wife of Gopal Saw Resident of village- Asthawan, PsAsthawan, Dist- Nalanda At Bihar Sharif 3.
Anita Devi @ Anita Kumari Daughter of Ram Vilash Prasad Resident of village- Asthawan, Ps- Asthawan, Dist- Nalanda At Bihar Sharif 4.
Raju Saw @ Raju Kumar Son of Resident of village, Po and Ps and DistLakhisarai ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Rakesh Singh, Advocate For the State :
Ms. Rina Sinha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 15-07-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.
2. The present application has been filed for the cancellation of bail granted to the Opposite Party No. 2 to 4, vide order dated 28.04.2026 passed by the learned S.D. J.M., Nalanda at Biharsharif in connection with Complaint Case No. 1065C of 2024, registered for offence under Sections 85, 352, 351(2), 351(3), 3(5) of B.N.S. and Section 3 & 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.
3. As per the prosecution case, the complainant was
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42273 of 2026(2) dt.15-07-2026 2/2 married to one Sunil Kumar and the opposite parties no. 2 to 4 are alleged to have tortured the complainant for demand of dowry.
4. I have perused the impugned order granting bail to the opposite party nos. 2 to 4 and do not find any error in the said order. Further, the petitioner has not been able to show any good ground to interfere with impugned order granting bail to the opposite party nos. 2 to 4. Hence, no ground for cancellation of bail is made out.
5. Accordingly, this application is dismissed. (Sandeep Kumar, J) pallavi/- U T