← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/19123/2017disposed

Birju Thakur v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-10-11Mr. Justice Dinesh Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19123 of 2017 ====================================================== Birju Thakur, son of Ram Prasad Thakur, resident of Village- Talimpur, P.S. Madhuban, District- East Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Public Administrative Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The District Magistrate-cum- Collector, East Champaran, Motihari.

3. The Additional Collector, Public Grievance Redressal Office, East Champaran, Motihari.

4. The Sub- Divisional Public Grievance Redressal Officer, Pakarideyal, East Champaran.

5. The District Supply Officer, East Champaran.

6. The Sub- Divisional Officer, Pakari Deyal, East Champaran.

7. The Block Supply Officer, Madhuban Block, East Champaran.

8. The Marketing Officer, Madhuban Block, East Champaran.

9. The Public Distribution System Dealer-cum- Madhuban PACS Chairman namely Chhunnu Sah, P.S.+ Block- Madhuban, District- East Champaran. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Karandeep Kumar For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Manoj Kumar, AC to GP 4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 11-10-2018 Heard learned counsels for the parties.

The present writ application has been filed for implementation of the order dated 26.4.2017 passed in Public Grievance Case No. 50261012-7101600125/1/A by Respondent No. 3, the Additional Collector, Public Grievance Redressal Officer, East Champaran-cum-1st Appellate Authority under Bihar Public Grievance Redressal Act.

After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to withdraw this writ application to take

Patna High Court CWJC No.19123 of 2017(2) dt.11-10-2018 2/2 recourse to second appeal for redressal of grievance. It is expected from the concerned authority that if any such appeal is filed along with an application for condonation of delay, the same shall be considered in view of the fact that this writ application was disposed of as withdrawn. (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) anil/- U