← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/1312/2018disposed

Mahesh Mahto And ANR v. The State Of Bihar Through Principal Secretary Sri Vinay Kumar Rural Works Department, Bihar, Patna

2023-03-01Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar,Mr. Justice Harish Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1312 of 2018 In Letters Patent Appeal No.1851 of 2016 ====================================================== 1.

Mahesh Mahto, Son of Late Teeyai Mahto.

2.

Jagdish Thakur, Son of Late Shiv Narayan Thakur. Both residents of Village Prem Nagar, P.S. - Runnisaidpur, District - Sitamarhi, at present both are working as Godown Chowkidar, Rural Works Department, Works Sub-Division, Sitamarhi, District - Sitamarhi. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Sri Vinay Kumar, Rural Works Department, Bihar, Patna.

2.

Sri Vinay Kumar, Secretary, Rural Works Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

Sri Kamlesh Chaudhary, Chief Engineer, R.E.O. - II, Rural Construction Works Department, Bihar, Patna.

4.

Sri Mukesh Prasad, Superintending Engineer, Rural Works Circle, Muzaffarpur, District - Muzaffarpur.

5.

Md. Parwez Alam, the Executive Engineer, Rural Works Department, Works Division, Sitamarhi.

6.

Sri Sushani Saurav, the Assistant Engineer, Rural Works Department, Works Division, Sitamarhi.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Durga Nand Jha, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR) 01-03-2023 In view of the requisition slip filed by the learned counsel for the applicants/petitioners, there does not appear to be any necessity in continuing with this contempt petition.

Patna High Court MJC No.1312 of 2018(4) dt.01-03-2023 2/2 In case any order has been passed pursuant to the directions given by this Court which aggrieves the petitioners, they may challenge the same, if so advised. The contempt petition stands consigned and disposed off accordingly.

(Ashutosh Kumar, J) (Harish Kumar, J) Praveen-II/- U