Pramod Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39441 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-357 Year-2021 Thana- MAJHAULIA District- West Champaran ====================================================== PRAMOD MAHTO Son of Late Sludhan Mahto Resident of Village - Bahuarwa, Chainpur, P.S.- Majhaulia, District - West Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Zainul Abedin, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 07-12-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 342, 323, 324, 325, 427, 353 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that while patrolling, he received an information that bride party has confined the groom party and were demanding money for releasing the groom, accordingly the informant reached the place of occurrence and with the help of police groom was released, it is next

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39441 of 2022(2) dt.07-12-2022 2/3 alleged that named accused persons, including the petitioner, created ruckus and even indulged in assaulting the police causing hurt to the informant.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case, it is next submitted that tensions brewed in the village as the groom side, after coming to the village for some reasons, was not ready to perform the marriage on account of which some altercation took place in which the police intervened and villagers requested the police not to intervene in personal matters, but then when police used force ruckus was created, but then the allegation of creating ruckus is general and omnibus in the nature.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39441 of 2022(2) dt.07-12-2022 3/3 each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Majhaulia P.S. Case No. 357 of 2021 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Shivam/- U T