Vicky Paswan @ Bicky Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39176 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-24 Year-2022 Thana- DINARA District- Rohtas ====================================================== VICKY PASWAN @ BICKY PASWAN Son of Surendra Paswan Resident of village- Haribanshpur, P.S.- Dinara, District- Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Jay Ram Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ram Priya Sharan Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 17-10-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 447, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and is a young boy of 20 years of age and the informant alleges that Suraj Paswan was assaulting his wife, but the matter was pacified by the villagers, further for the aforesaid reason, Suraj and petitioner came to the house of the informant in the evening and petitioner assaulted the husband of the informant by lathi causing injury on the head.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case, it is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39176 of 2022(2) dt.17-10-2022 2/2 next submitted that the date of occurrence is 22.01.2022 and the FIR came to be instituted on 25.01.2022 i.e., after a delay of three days without any plausible explanation, it is also submitted that the injury suffered is simple in nature and the FIR does not disclose the reason, as to why Suraj and petitioner came to the house of the informant when the matter was already pacified by the villagers when Suraj was having fight with his wife. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Dinara P.S. Case No. 24 of 2022 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Shivam/- U T