Ravindra Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48897 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-42 Year-2025 Thana- ISUAPUR District- Saran ====================================================== Ravindra Kumar, aged about 22 years (Male), S/O Namuna Sah @ Namuna Jee Sah Sonar, R/O Vill.- Sahwa, P.S.- Isuapur, Dist.- Saran. ... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Mr. Binay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party :
Mr. Murli Dhar, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 07-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Ishuapur P.S. Case No. 42 of 2025 dated 28.02.2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 310(4), 310(5), 317(4), 317(5) of the B.N.S., 2023, Sections 25(1-B)(a), 26, 35 of the Arms Act, Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 and Sections 8(c) and 21(b) of the N.D.P.S. Act.
3. As per the prosecution case, Police apprehended Dhiraj Kumar, Suraj Kumar, Deep Ranjan Kumar and Arman Babu from the Samudayik Bhawan who were assembled to commit loot in Ishuapur Bazar and on search, two live
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48897 of 2025(2) dt.07-08-2025 2/3 cartridges, cash of Rs. 28,500/-, two mobiles, fire arms, 750 Ml of foreign liquor, one iron knife, 54 Gram Charas kept in plastic of yellow colour, one electronic pocket weighing machine of silver colour, Aluminium pipe which were kept on the Chouki and three motorcycles which were standing outside the said Bhawan, were recovered from their possession.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and his name has surfaced in the present case on the basis of the confessional statement of the co-accused Deep Ranjan Kumar. It is further submitted that the petitioner is the owner of the gold shop. The petitioner has no role in the present case. No incriminating article has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. It is further submitted that the other co-accused person, namely, Suraj Kumar, has already been granted bail by a Bench of this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 35433 of 2025 vide order dated 10.07.2025. The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated in paragraph no. 3 of the bail application. The petitioner is in custody in this case since 28.02.2025.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail petition of the petitioner.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48897 of 2025(2) dt.07-08-2025 3/3
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well the period of custody, let the above named petitioner, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge, Saran at Chapra in connection with Ishuapur P.S. Case No. 42 of 2025.
7. The application stands allowed.
(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) U.K./- U T