← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./41257/2024bail granted

Sri Ram Yadav @ Shri Ram Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2024-07-03Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41257 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-265 Year-2024 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Aurangabad ====================================================== SRI RAM YADAV @ SHRI RAM KUMAR SON OF MAHENDRA YADAV RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - MAHADEVA @ MAHADE, P.S. - OBRA, DISTRICT - AURANGABAD, BIHAR ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms.Rupa Kumari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Madhura Nand Jha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 03-07-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a) & 32(3), 41(1) & 41(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 in connection with Excise P.S. Case No.265 of 2024.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and allegation is of recovery of 60 liters of liquor from a motorcycle.

4. It is next submitted that petitioner was not

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41257 of 2024(2) dt.03-07-2024 2/3 arrested from the spot as such nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and he came to be implicated based on the fact that he is owner of the motorcycle. It is next submitted that no prudent person would use his own vehicle for committing an occurrence and thus would create evidence against himself and hence would get implicated. It is also submitted that petitioner was completely unaware that his friend Pawan would misuse the vehicle in the manner as alleged who was also apprehended from the spot.

5. The learned APP for the State opposes the anticipatory bail application.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs.500/- (Rupees Five Hundred) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge, Excise Court No.2, Aurangabad in connection with Excise P.S. Case No.265 of 2024, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

7. It is made clear that the learned trial court before

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41257 of 2024(2) dt.03-07-2024 3/3 accepting the bail bonds of the petitioner shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in the event, if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of even one case, in that event, the present anticipatory bail order shall not be given effect.

8. The application stands allowed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Prakash Narayan U T