Md. Taseem Nawab v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.805 of 2018 ====================================================== Md. Taseem Nawab, s/o late Nawab Ali, r/o vill-Jamalpura, ward no. 31, PS-Laheriasarai, Dist- Darbhanga .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Urbn Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

2. The Collector, Darbhanga

3. The Divisional Commissioner, Darbhanga Division, Darbhanga

4. The Sr. Deputy Collector-cum-District Grievance Redressal Cell Officer, District Public Grievance Redressal cell, Darbhanga

5. The District Education Officer, Darbhanga

6. The Civil Surgeon-cum-Chief Medical Officer, Darbhanga

7. The Head Moulvi, Madrasa, Bahrul Oloom Abbasia, At Chakka, PO-Jorja, Dist- Darbhanga

8. The Municipal Commissioner, Darbhanga Municipal Corporation, Darbhanga

9. The Block Education Officer, Alinagar Block, PS-Alinagar, Dist- Darbhanga

10. Md. Izharul Haque, s/o late Md. Ibrahim, r/o moh-Chak Rahmat, PS-Laheriasarai, Dist- Darbhanga .... .... Respondent/s ============================================== ======== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Abdul Wadood For the State : Mr. Kinkar Kumar-Sc9 For respondent no. 8 : Mr. Bindhyachal Rai ============================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 17-01-2018 The learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, admits that the petitioner has no locus to approach this Court inasmuch as, he does not have any cause of

Patna High Court CWJC No.805 of 2018 (2) dt.17-01-2018 2/2 action. However, considering the nature of the prayer made in the writ petition, it would be sufficient, if it is directed that the petitioner may file a representation before the concerned authority within two weeks from today which may be considered by the concerned authority.

The writ petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) rinkee/- U