Rohit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36836 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-69 Year-2025 Thana- KHUSRUPUR District- Patna ====================================================== Rohit Kumar S/o- Dinesh Singh Resident Of village- Punda, Ps- Fatuha, DistPatna ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
Akhilesh Singh S/o- Late Nihori Singh Village- Lodipur Ps- Khushrupur Dist- Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Shivjee Singh, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Madhura Nand Jha, APP For the informant :
Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Adv.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 25-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in Special POCSO Case No. 74 of 2025 arising out of Khushrupur P.S. Case No. 69 of 2025 registered under Sections-115(2), 126(2), 74, 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S. Act and Section-8/12 of the POCSO Act.
3. Both the victims are the girls of 12 years and 13 years of age respectively. Allegedly, when they were returning from the coaching, the petitioner and the co-accused dragged her into orchard and started committing misdeed/teasing with them. When the villagers assembled, they fled away. It has also been
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36836 of 2025(3) dt.25-11-2025 2/2 alleged that the petitioner was continuously sending call messages and video messages on the mobile set of the victim.
4. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner and the victims are the agnates and the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case without any rhyme and reasons.
5. On the otherhand, the learned counsel for the informant opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the petitioner does not deserve the privilege of anticipatory bail and accordingly, the same is rejected.
(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) A.K.V.//- U T