← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./36725/2025bail granted

Satyendra Kumar @ Murari v. The State Of Bihar

2025-06-18Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36725 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-857 Year-2022 Thana- BARACHATTI District- Gaya ====================================================== Satyendra Kumar @ Murari S/o- Sita Ram Das Resident of Village- Kahudag Nimiyatand PS- Barachatti District- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Binod Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ram Priya Sharan Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 18-06-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Barachatti P.S. Case No. 857 of 2022 instituted for the offence under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

3.

Prosecution case in short is that on 21-09-2022, informant after collecting Rs. 48,050/- was on his way and in the meantime, he was accosted with three miscreants who have snatched entire amount on the point of pistol. 4.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 05-03-2025. Petitioner bears one criminal antecedent, as per disclosure made in paragraph No. 3 of the bail application.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36725 of 2025(2) dt.18-06-2025 2/3 5.

It has been further submitted by the petitioner's counsel that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. Petitioner is not named in the FIR. Name of the petitioner has transpired on the basis of confessional statement of coaccused, namely, Ranjeet Kumar. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Petitioner was not even put on T.I. Parade. Charge sheet is submitted in this case.

6.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. 7.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, period of custody of the petitioner, there being no recovery from the petitioner's possession and charge sheet being submitted, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 8.

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Barachatti P.S. Case No. 857 of 2022, subject to the following conditions:

(I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioner.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36725 of 2025(2) dt.18-06-2025 3/3 (II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Raj Kishore/- U T