Patna High CourtCWJC/11545/2017disposed

Amit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-04-18Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11545 of 2017 ======================================================

1. Amit Kumar, Son of Late Pramila Kumar, Resident of MohallaManbodh Nagar, Pani Tanki, Gosai Mohala, P.O.+P.S.- Bikramganj, District- Rohtas.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Health, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Director-in-Chief, Health Services, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4. The Civil Surgeon cum Chief Medical Officer, Rohtas, Sasaram.

5. The In-charge, Medical Officer, Primary Health Center, Bikramganj, Rohtas.

6. Dr. Arun Kumar, son of name not known to the petitioner, The then Incharge, Medical Officer, Primary Health Centre, Bikramganj, presently residing at Dumraon Road, Bikramganj, Rohtas.

7. Lal Babu Prasad, son of name not known to the Petitioner, Resident of Village- Ghosiakala, P.O.+P.S.- Bikramganj, District- Rohtas, presently posted as Clerk, Primary Health Center, Bikramganj, Rohtas.

8. The District Magistrate, Sasaram at Rohtas .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kanhaiya Pandey For the Respondent/s : Mr. A.B. Sinha- Ga8 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 18-04-2018 At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to add District Magistrate, Sasaram at Rohtas as respondent no. 8 to the present writ petition. The same be done during the course of the day. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied in case, he is permitted to file a representation regarding his grievance mentioned in the writ petition, before the newly added respondent no. 8.

Patna High Court CWJC No.11545 of 2017 (2) dt.18-04-2018 2/2 Accordingly, it is directed that the petitioner may file a representation before the newly added respondent no. 8 within a period of two weeks from today and the respondent no. 8 shall dispose of the same by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of four weeks thereafter, failing which, the concerned authority shall be visited with penal consequences. The writ petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. .

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) rinkee/- U