Patna High CourtCWJC/1363/2015disposed

Tahsin Jahan v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-02-04Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1363 of 2015 ====================================================== Tahsin Jahan, wife of Sadrujjaman Khan, resident of village- Paharpur, Panchayat -Harnath, Ward No.10, P.S. Sahkund, District- Bhagalpur .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The Directorate, Integrated Children Development Services, Bihar, Patna

3. The Commissioner, Bhagalpur

4. The Collector, Bhagalpur

5. The District Programme Officer, Bhagalpur

6. The Child Development Project Officer, Bhagalpur

7. The Mukhiya Gram Panchayat, Harnath Block, Sahkund, P.S. Sahkund, District-Bhagalpur

8. The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat, Harnath, Block & P.S. Sahkund, Bhagalpur

9. Ujala Khatoon, wife Hannan Khan, resident of village- Paharpur Panchayat-Harnath, Block & P.S. Sahkund, District-Bhagalpur .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manohar Prasad Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. AC to GA-10 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 04-02-2017 Learned State Counsel intends to file counter affidavit. It may be filed in the Registry.

Heard Sri Manohar Prasad Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AC to GA-10.

The petitioner, in the present writ petition, has prayed for directing the Respondents to dispose of his application in respect of her appointment on the post of Anganbari Sevika at the Centre No. 219, Ward no.10, village-Paharpur, BlockSahkund , District-Bhagalpur.

Patna High Court CWJC No.1363 of 2015 (3) dt.04-02-2017 2/2 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during pendency of this writ petition, on her representation/objection, an order has already been passed by the District Programme Officer.

In view of the fact that now the order has already been passed on her application/objection, there is no reason to keep the matter further pending. The Court is of the opinion that if the petitioner feels aggrieved against the order, which has been passed by the District Programme Officer, she would be at liberty to avail appropriate remedy.

The prayer is allowed.

The writ petition stands disposed of.

(Rakesh Kumar, J) NKS/- U