Kumari Kiran v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41087 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-7 Year-2024 Thana- BISHUNPUR CHOWK DistrictDarbhanga ====================================================== 1.

Kumari Kiran Wife Of Pawan Yadav Resident Of Village - Baghla Kamalpur, P.S. - Bishanpur, District - Darbhanga 2.

Ras Lal Yadav Son Of Late Laxmi Yadav Resident Of Village - Baghla Kamalpur, P.S. - Bishanpur, District - Darbhanga ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Saurav Anand For the Opposite Party/s :

Dr. Ajeet Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 09-08-2024 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application with respect to Petitioner No. 2, Ras Lal Yadav.

3.

Permission is accorded.

2.

The petitioner No. 1 apprehends her arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 409, 420 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and is a woman and has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41087 of 2024(3) dt.09-08-2024 2/3 with an allegation that an amount of Rs. 28 lakh and odd was sanctioned for completing the work of Jal Nal Yojna, out of which an amount of Rs. 27 lakh and odd was withdrawn by the petitioner and other accused persons and the work done was only of Rs. 22,81,000/- as such an amount of Rs. 4,21,762/- stands misappropriated.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case without properly verifying the fact that as to whether the scheme for which the money was withdrawn, was completed or not. It is next submitted that from perusal of the report of the Technical Assistant which forms part of the FIR, it would manifest that the same records that entire work has already been completed. 5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner No. 1, above-named, in the event of her arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41087 of 2024(3) dt.09-08-2024 3/3 is pending/successor court in connection with Bishanpur P.S. Case No. 07 of 2024 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) SUMIT/- U T