Sarfaraz Alam v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37417 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-84 Year-2026 Thana- BEGUSARAI MUFFASIL DistrictBegusarai ====================================================== Sarfaraz Alam S/o Manawar Alam @ Manowar Alam Resident of village - Kaithi, Police Station - Chautham, District - Khagaria ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Md. Anwar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Asha Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 16-06-2026 Heard Mr. Md. Anwar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Asha Kumari, learned APP for the State.

2. Petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since 19.04.2026, in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 84 of 2026, F.I.R. dated 18.04.2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 318(4), 223, 111(2), 3(5), 61(2) of the B.N.S., 2023.

3. The case relates to recovery of incriminating articles from the possession of the petitioner and other coaccused persons.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has clean antecedent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. It appears from the F.I.R. that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37417 of 2026(2) dt.16-06-2026 2/3 equipments have been recovered from co-accused person, namely, Manish Kumar and he has disclosed the name of the petitioner and the except the disclosure made by apprehended co-accused person, no other cogent material has come during investigation to suggest the involvement of the petitioner in the present occurrence. The petitioner is in custody since 19.04.2026.

5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that the petitioner having clean antecedent and the name of the petitioner has been transpired during investigation on the basis of disclosed made by apprehended co-accused person, namely, Manish Kumar and the equipments have been recovered from the possession of co-accused person, namely, Manish Kumar, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-I, Begusarai in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 84 of 2026, subject to the following conditions :-

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37417 of 2026(2) dt.16-06-2026 3/3

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witness, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(3) And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedents, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Ibrar//- U T