← Library
Patna High CourtCR. WJC/950/2014withdrawn

Md. Ezaz Alam v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-03-30Mr. Justice Ashwani Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.950 of 2014 ====================================================== Md. Ezaz Alam, son of Jane Alam, resident of Thana Chowk Purab Tola, Jamui, P.O. + P.S.+ District-Jamui. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna.

3. The Inspector General of Police, Bhagalpur.

4. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Munger.

5. The Superintendent of Police, Jamui.

6. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Jamui.

7. The SHO, Town Police, Jamui, P.S.-Jamui.

.... .... Respondents 1st set

8. Md. Nayeem @ Budhan Mian @ Patel @ Mohan, son of Late Mahboob, resident of Khaira Road, Paschim Tola, Jamui, P.O. + P.S. + District-Jamui.

9. Md. Kamruddin @ Md. Kamruddin Master, son of Samsuddin, resident of Rajanagar, Ward No. 18, Jamui, P.O. + P.S. + District-Jamui.

10. Md. Sarfuddin, son of Md. Mannan, resident of Khaira Road, Jamui, P.O. + P.S. + District-Jamui.

11. Md. Pappu Ali, son of Late Suleman Ali, resident of Khaira Road, Jamui, P.O. + P.S. + District-Jamui.

12. Jitendra Kumar Sinha, son of name not known to the petitioner, deed writer, license no. 08/03, registry court, Jamui, P.O. + P.S. + DiustrictJamui. ... ..... Respondents 2nd set.

====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashutosh Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Respondents-State: Mr. Sunil Kumar AC to SC-2 For the Respondent no. 8 : Mr. Sushil Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent no. 9 : Mr. Bindhyachal Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.950 of 2014 (2) dt.30-03-2015 2 / 2 2 30-03-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the respondent nos. 8 and 9.

After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this application as investigation of the case is still pending.

Leave is granted.

The application is disposed of as withdrawn.

(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.) Sanjeet/- U T