Patna High CourtCWJC/2863/2015disposed

Anil Kumar Singh And ORS v. The Chie Executive Officer Danapur Cantonment Board

2015-02-20Mr. Justice Dr. Ravi Ranjan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2863 of 2015 ======================================================

1. Anil Kumar Singh Son of Late Sanchit Rai

2. Sudarshan Rai

3. Ishwardhari Singh Both son of Late Gurucharan Rai

4. Tipan Rai Son of Late Ram Lakhan Rai

5. Narendra Rai Son of Late Dewa Nand Rai

6. Om Prakash Rai Son of Late Munsi Lal Rai

7. Daroga Rai Son of Late Lakhan Rai

8. Anand Prakash son of Late Shyam Babu Singh

9. Ram Nath Rai Son of Late Banshi Rai

10. Kedar Nath Rai Son of Hansdhari Rai

11. Dina Nath Rai Sonof Late Ambika Rai

12. Satya Nand Singh Son of Late Kalika Prasad Singh

13. Banshi Singh son of Late Ram Sundar Rai

14. Brij Nandan Rai Son of Late Sita Ram Rai

15. Jiya Nand Rai Son of Late Sheo Shankar Rai

16. Mahesh Kumar Son of Late Basant Rai All residents of Sabji Mandi, Pethiya Bazar, Danapur Cantt., Police Station - Danapur, District - Patna.... .... Petitioners

Versus

1. The Chie Executive officer Danapur Cantonment Board, P.S. Danapur, District Patna,

2. Danapur Cantonment Board through its Chief Executive Officer, Danapur, District Patna, .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners : Mr. Mukul Prasad, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Ram Kumar Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL ORDER 20-02-2015 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to implead Danapur Cantonment Board through its Chief Executive Officer, Danapur, District Patna, as respondent no. 2 in this writ application.

Heard the parties.

In view of the limited prayer made at the time of hearing

Patna High Court CWJC No.2863 of 2015 (2) dt.20-02-2015 of the writ application, the same is being disposed of with a liberty to the petitioners to approach the respondent no. 2, i.e., Danapur Cantonment Board through its Chief Executive Officer, Danapur, District Patna, by filing a representation along with a certified copy of this order. If any representation is filed by the petitioners then the same should be disposed of on its own merit and in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of its filing. However, it is made clear that this Court has not formed or expressed any opinion with respect to the merit of the case of the petitioners.

(Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J) SC/- U