← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/2024/2016disposed

Kesho Prasad v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-01-18Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2024 of 2016 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 2246 of 2011 ====================================================== Kesho Prasad Son of Late Dr. Dwarika Prasad Barnwal Resident of House No. 5, Ground Floor C/o Siya Ram Prasad, North Srikrishnapuri, Rajendra Path, Boring Road, Police Station Srikrishnapuri, District - Patna .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Sri Pankaj Kumar, the Principal Secretary, Road Construction Department, Vishwesharaiya Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna

3. Sri Gayan Chandra, The Joint Secretary, Road Construction Department, Vishwesharaiya Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna

4. Sri P.K. Singh, the Accountant General ( Accounts and Entitlement ), Bihar, Patna, Virchand Patel Path, Patna

5. Sri Mithilesh Kumar, the Deputy Secretary ( Management Cell ), Road Construction Department, Vishwesharaiya Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna, Patna .... .... opposite party /s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rupak Kumar For the opposite party/s : AC to GP - 22 Sri Mani Kant Mishra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 18-01-2017 Heard Sri Rupak Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner , learned AC to GP No. 22 as well as Sri Mani Kant Mishra, learned counsel, who has appeared on behalf of the Accountant General, Bihar.

In this case earlier show -cause was filed and lastly supplementary show-cause has been filed on behalf of the opposite party no. 2, 3 and 5 wherein it has been indicated that in compliance with the order of the writ court the case of A.C.P. was

Patna High Court MJC No.2024 of 2016 (8) dt.18-01-2017 2/2 considered and benefit of 2nd A.C.P. has already been granted. Learned State Counsel in view of the statement made in paragraph no. 4 of the supplementary show -cause has produced two banker's cheque bearing no. 052323 and 052324 for Rs. 5150/- and 10078/- respectively and in presence of the Court he hands over the cheques to Sri Rupak Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner.

In view of the statement made in paragraph no. 4 of the supplementary show -cause as well as the fact that banker's cheque has already been handed over, there is no reason to keep the matter pending.

The petition stands disposed of.

(Rakesh Kumar, J) Praful/- U