← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./39207/2022bail granted

Chandan Kumar Yadav @ Chandan Kr. Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2022-08-20Mr. Justice Chandra Shekhar Jha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39207 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-62 Year-2022 Thana- KHUTAUNA District- Madhubani ====================================================== CHANDAN KUMAR YADAV @ CHANDAN KR. YADAV Son of Jibachh Yadav Resident of Village - Malin Belha, P.s.- Lalmanya, Distt.- Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ratanakar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms.Pushpa Sinha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER 20-08-2022 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within a period of four weeks from today.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Khutauna P.S. Case No. 62 of 2022 registered for the offence under Sections 272, 273 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018. The accused/petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and is in custody since 01.05.2022.

The allegation against the petitioner is to be engaged in illegal trading/manufacturing of illicit liquor, where, there is recovery of 900 litres of IMFL/country made liquor from the alleged vehicle.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is neither owner nor driver of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39207 of 2022(2) dt.20-08-2022 2/2 alleged vehicle and no way connected with alleged vehicle from where recovery of illicit liquor was made. It is further submitted that the petitioner involved in present case merely on the ground that he was a passerby. It has been submitted that investigation is complete, where charge-sheet has been submitted, as such, there is no chance of tampering with the evidence. Learned APP, opposes the prayer of bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances as mentioned above, as recovery of illicit liquor has not been made from the conscious physical possession of the petitioner coupled with the fact that charge-sheet has been submitted, let the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail in connection with Khutauna P.S. Case No. 62 of 2022 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-Special Judge, Excise Act, Madhubani/concerned court, subject to the conditions as mentioned under Section 437(3) of Cr.P.C.

(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J) pooja/- U T