← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/2183/2018disposed

Arun Kumar Choudhary v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2023-07-17Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2183 of 2018 ====================================================== Arun Kumar Choudhary, S/o Late Ram Lakhan Choudhary, Resident of Village-Nayatol, Police Station-Mansoorchak, District-Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

The Principal Secretary, Rural Development Department, Government of BIhar, Patna.

3.

The Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Government of BIhar, Patna. 4.

The District Magistrate, Begusarai.

5.

The Additional Collector, Begusarai.

6.

The Sub Divisional Magistrate, teghra, District-Begusarai. 7.

The Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Teghra, District-Begusarai. 8.

The Circle Officer, Mansurchak Block, District-Begusarai. 9.

The Executive Engineer, District Rural development Authority, DistrictBegusarai. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms. Sanjana, Advocate Mr. Ajay Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Binod Kumar Sinha, AC to GP-7 For Intervenour :

Mr. Kaushal Kumar Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 17-07-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that his raiyati land appertaining to Thana No. 273, Khata No. 10, Khesra No. 705, area 2 Katha 7 Dhur has been taken by the government officials.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

Patna High Court CWJC No.2183 of 2018 dt.17-07-2023 2/2 road has been constructed, but the compensation has not been provided to him. He further submits that though the petitioner has filed a representation before respondent No. 8, namely, the Circle Officer, Mansurchak Block, but till date, the grievances of the petitioner has not been redressed.

4. Learned counsel for the State submits that the petitioner has not filed representation before the authorities who are competent to decide the matter under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

5. This writ petition is disposed of directing the petitioner to represent before the respondent No.4, namely, the District Magistrate, Begusarai whereupon the District Magistrate, Begusarai after verifying the entitlement of the petitioner about the land shall pass a reasoned and speaking order within eight weeks from the date of representation.

6. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merit of the case.

(Dr. Anshuman, J) Ashwini/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 19.07.2023 Transmission Date NA