Arun Kumar @ Arun Prasad And ANR. v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.39058 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -307 Year- 2012 Thana -KISHANGANJ District- KISANGANJ ======================================================

1. Arun Kumar @ Arun Prasad, son of Yogendra Nandan Prasad @ Yogendra Prasad

2. suraj Kumar son of Ram Briksha Rai, both residents of village- Baikathpur, P.S. Khusrupur, District-Patna .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance:

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nagendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Mayanand Jha(APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 01-11-2017 The learned counsel for the petitioners have challenged the order dated 18.04.2013 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Kishanganj in G.R. No. 915 of 2012 corresponding to Kishanganj P.S. Case No. 307 of 2012 whereby and whereunder cognizance has been taken against the petitioner for the offences under Sections 419 and 420/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

This Court by an order dated 11.09.2017 had called for a report from the concerned court. The said report has been sent by the learned trial court by letter dated 16.09.2017 kept at flag 'M'. According to the said report, the charges have been framed and four prosecution witnesses have already been produced and the present case is pending for evidence of the informant.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.39058 of 2014 (6) dt.01-11-2017 2/2 In view of the aforesaid, the learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the present petition has become infructuous.

Accordingly, the present petition is disposed off as having become infructuous.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/- U T