Ram Pravesh Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35844 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1 Year-2020 Thana- KHIRI MORE District- Patna ====================================================== 1.

RAM PRAVESH RAM Son of Rikki Mochi Resident of Village- Sidhipur, P.S.- Khirimore, District- Patna.

2.

NANDA DEVI Wife of Ram Pravesh Ram Resident of Village- Sidhipur, P.S.- Khirimore, District- Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Amit Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.AJit Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 03-03-2021 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Ajit Kumar, the learned APP for the State. The petitioners seek regular bail in connection with Khiri More PS case no. 01 of 2020 instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 304(B), 120(B)/34 of Indian Penal Code.

The allegation is regarding the accused persons including the petitioners herein, who are the father-in-law and mother-in-law of the deceased victim lady, having killed the deceased victim lady on account of non-fulfilment of the demand for dowry.

The learned counsel for the petitioners has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35844 of 2020(3) dt.03-03-2021 2/2 submitted that the petitioners are innocent, have been falsely implicated in the present case, are having clean antecedent and are languishing in custody since 20.07.2020. The learned counsel for the petitioners has further submitted that the petitioners are having no complicity in the alleged occurrence. Per contra, the learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties and taking into account the materials available on record as also those available in the case diary, I find that the complicity of the petitioners in the alleged crime is writ large and there are ample materials in the case diary to suggest the role of the petitioners in the alleged murder of the deceased victim lady on account of non-fulfilment of the demand for dowry, hence I do not find any merit in the present petition, accordingly the same stands dismissed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) rinkee/- U T