Nitu Kumari And ANR v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Letters Patent Appeal No.456 of 2017 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 15868 of 2009 ===========================================================
1. Nitu Kumari, daughter of Sri Shiv Kumar Singh, resident of Village- Maheba, P.O.- Chariyari, P.S.- Makhdumpur, District- Jehanabad.
2. Shashi Bhushan Kumar, son of Sri Ram Sevak Singh, Resident of VillageKakhaura, P.O.- Pandaul, P.S.- Sakurabad, District- Jehanabad. .... .... Appellants
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
2. The Collector, Jehanabad.
3. The District Development Commissioner, Jehanabad.
4. The District Superintendent of Education, Jehanabad.
5. The Block Development Officer, Makhdumpur, P.S.- Makhdumpur, DistrictJehanabad.
6. The Block Education Extension Officer, Block Office- Makhdumpur, DistrictJehanabad.
7. The Mukhiya, Sumera Gram Panchayat, Sumera, P.S.- Makhdumpur, P.O.- Birra, District- Jehanabad.
8. The Panchayat Secretary, Sumera Gram Panchayat, P.O.- Birra, P.S.- Makhdumpur, District- Jehanabad.
9. The District Teacher Employment Appellate Tribunal, Jehanabad.
10. Sabita Kumari, wife of Dhananjay Kumar Mridul, Resident of VillageGhanshyam Bigha, P.O.- Birra, P.S.- Makhdumpur, District- Jehanabad. .... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s : Mr. Raj Ballabh Singh, Advocate. For the Respondent/s : Mr. ASHUTOSH RANJAN PANDEY-AAG15 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date: 19-04-2017 Considering the fact that the writ court, while allowing the petition of respondent no. 10 Sabita Kumari has only directed for appointing her, as she was a more meritorious candidate in comparison to all other concerned. No error has been committed by
Patna High Court LPA No.456 of 2017 dt.19-04-2017 2/2 the learned writ court, warranting re-consideration. The more meritorious candidate is entitled for appointment and respondent no.10 Sabita Kumari, being the most eligible and meritorious candidate, the learned writ court has directed her for re-appointment. We find no error in the same, warranting re-consideration. The appeal is therefore, dismissed.
(Rajendra Menon, CJ) (Sudhir Singh, J) Amit/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 28-04-2017 Transmission Date NA