Brij Bihari Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.980 of 2021 ====================================================== Brij Bihari Singh S/o Late Ramnandan Singh Resident of Village and P.O. Jagdishpur, P.S.- Vijaipur, District- Gopalganj. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna, 2.

The Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna, 3.

The Director, Primary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna, 4.

The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Saran Division at Chapra, District- Saran.

5.

The District Education Officer, Gopalganj, District- Gopalganj. 6.

The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Gopalganj, DistrictGopalganj. 7.

The District Account Officer, Gopalganj, District- Gopalganj. 8.

The Treasury Officer, Gopalganj, District- Gopalganj. 9.

The Block Education Officer, Kataya, District- Gopalganj. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Suresh Prasad Bhakta, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Prabhakar Jha, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 30-07-2024 Having gone through the case in its entirety and heard learned counsel for the parties, it would be deem, fit, proper and in the interest of justice, to relegate the case of the petitioner before the concerned authority for just and proper decision.

2. Accordingly, I direct the petitioner to file a detailed representation before the District Programme Officer (Establishment), Gopalganj (respondent no.6) along with the

Patna High Court CWJC No.980 of 2021(6) dt.30-07-2024 2/2 documents, which have been annexed in this writ application, in support of his claim, within a period of two weeks from today. The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Gopalganj (respondent no.6) is directed to consider the case of the petitioner after affording opportunity of personal hearing and pass a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law within ten weeks from the date of receipt of such representation.

3. It is made clear that respondent no.6 shall be solely liable for non-compliance of this order within the stipulated period.

4. With the aforesaid direction, this writ application stands disposed of.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Trivedi/- U