Ramanad Mukhiya v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39324 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-130 Year-2025 Thana- BANJARIA District- East Champaran ====================================================== Ramanad Mukhiya, S/o- Botu Mukhiya Village- Ajgarwa, W. No.-13, P.SBanjariya ,District-East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Vijay Shankar Shrivastava, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Murli Dhar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH ORAL ORDER 04-07-2025 Heard Mr. Vijay Shankar Shrivastava, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Mr. Murli Dhar, learned APP for the State.
2. Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Banjariya P.S. Case No. 130 of 2025 dated 28.02.2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 109, 303(2), 352 and 351(2) of the B.N.S.
3. The main submissions advanced by the petitioner's counsel are that there is case and counter case in between both the parties, the FIR of the instant matter is counter blast of the FIR of Banjariya P.S. Case No. 137 of 2025 lodged by Punam Devi, co-accused of the present matter, against the informant and others and in the instant matter, only informant is said to have sustained injuries in the alleged occurrence but the manner
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39324 of 2025(2) dt.04-07-2025 2/2 of occurrence as stated by him in the FIR, does not get corroboration from the injury report because as per the allegation, he was badly assaulted by using several types of weapons but on his person, only simple injuries were found and further, the petitioner is a seventy year old and he is simply alleged to have assaulted the victim by means of lathi. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been languishing in jail since 01.03.2025 and against him, the investigation has been completed.
4. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
5. Considering the aforesaid submissions advanced by petitioner's counsel, this Court is inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, let the petitioner named-above be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the concerned Court in connection with Banjariya P.S. Case No. 130 of 2025.
(Shailendra Singh, J) maynaz/- U T