Chhotan Yadav And ANR v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.23559 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -204 Year- 2015 Thana -DULHIN BAZAR District- PATNA ======================================================
1. Chhotan Yadav
2. Rajendra Yadav Both sons of Harju Yadav, .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Uma Shankar Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 25-05-2016 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State.
The petitioners are apprehending arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 283, 332, 333, 307, 353, 427, 152, 504 of the Indian Penal Code.
The prosecution case is that the informant being police officer received information on 18.12.2015 at 6.40 PM about the protest being made against crushing of Yogendra Yadav by a truck. The informant along with other police officials reached at the spot but the mob prevented the police from sending the dead body for autopsy. Under the leadership of co-accused Mithilesh Yadav the mob blocked the road and ultimately set ablaze the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.23559 of 2016 (2) dt.25-05-2016 2/2 truck in question. Thirteen persons were caught on the spot who disclosed the names of escapees, the petitioners were among them.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the accusation is against the mob. A statement has been made in paragraph 3 of the petition that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent.
Considering the accusation against the mob, let the above named petitioners be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of `10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned ACJM-III, Danapur, Patna, in connection with Dulhin Bazar P.S. Case No.204/2015, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.
(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) Ashwini/- U T