Patna High CourtMJC/2763/2017dismissed

Kishuni Devi @ Bishuni Devi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-09-25Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2763 of 2017 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 7478 of 2012 ====================================================== Kishuni Devi @ Bishuni Devi, wife of Toofani Ram, R/o Village - Deoriya, Police Station - Kateya, District - Gopalganj. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.The State of Bihar.

2.Rahul Kumar, The Collector-cum-District Magistrate, Gopalganj. 3.Ravi Ranjan Prasad, Superintendent of Police, Gopalganj. 4.Pramod Kumar Ram, Sub-Divisional Officer, Hathuwa, DistrictGopalganj. 5.Nurul An, the Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Hathuwa, DistrictGopalganj.

6. Upendra Nath Tiwary, Anchal Adhikari Panchdeory Anchal, District - Gopalganj.

7. Dhananjay Singh, Officer-in-Charge, Kateya, Police Station, District - Gopalganj.

8. Kapildeo Ram, Son of late Khelawan Ram, R/0 Village - Deoriya, Police Station - Kateya, District - Gopalganj.

9.Chandrakali Devi, wife of Kapildeo Ram, R/o Village - Deoriya, Police Station - Kateya, District - Gopalganj.

10. Bikai Ram @ Bijay Ram, son of late Dukhi Ram, R/o Village - Deoriya, Police Station - Katya, District-Gopalganj. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vasudeo Ram, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Khurshid Alam ( AAG-12 ) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 25-09-2018 This contempt application cannot proceed because what actually the petitioner is looking for is implementation of the order passed by the D.C.L.R, Hathuwa, in Land Dispute Solution Case No. 36/2011-12. Earlier the contempt application being M.J.C. No. 3380 of 2013 was dismissed by a learned Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 06.01.2014.

Patna High Court MJC No.2763 of 2017 (2) dt.25-09-2018 In the given facts and circumstance, the contempt application is dismissed but with liberty to the petitioner to seek her remedy in accordance with law if the order of the D.C.L.R. still exists in her favour.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) R.R.Ojha.