Dhanjee Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35172 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-64 Year-2018 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Rohtas ====================================================== DHANJEE RAM Son of Ramchandra Ram Resident of VillageRaghunathpur, Police Station- Karakat (Gorari), District- Rohtas at Sasaram. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Chanchala Devi Wife of Dhanjee Ram Resident of Village- Raghunathpur, Police Station- Karakat (Gorari), District- Rohtas at Sasaram. At sasaram Daughter of Jaigovind Ram, At present resident of Village- Semaria, Police Station- Kochas, District- Rohtas at Sasaram. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Raghunandan Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Damodar Prasad Tiwary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 26-09-2019 Petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No. 64 of 2018 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 498A, 495, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. Allegation as per FIR is that petitioner demanded one motorcycle and Rs.50,000/- from the informant and for that he being husband of the informant tortured her. It further appears from the order dated 27.8.2019 that in view of submission that petitioner was ready to keep her with dignity and care, he was directed to approach opposite party No.2 and persuade her to come along with him. In this case it appears that in spite of service of notice, opposite party No.2 has not appeared. A submission has been made by learned counsel for the petitioner that in view of direction of this

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35172 of 2019(4) dt.26-09-2019 2/2 Court, petitioner has approached the opposite party No.2 in presence of villagers, but she is not ready to come and reside with him. Heard learned APP also.

In view of above facts and circumstances, let petitioner surrender in the court below and on surrender he shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dehri, Rohtas at Sasaram-I, in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No. 64 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. and further condition is that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immoveable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned and further condition that in future if opposite party No.2 wants to reside with the petitioner, he has to keep her with dignity and care. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U T