Aman Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39496 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-3 Year-2025 Thana- ROSERA District- Samastipur ====================================================== 1.
Aman Kumar S/O Hare Ram Das R/O Village- Bhatandi, Ward No. 09, P.SRosera, Distt.- Samastipur. 2.
Satish Kumar S/O Hare Ram Das R/O Village- Bhatandi, Ward No. 09, P.SRosera, Distt.- Samastipur. 3.
Manish Kumar @ Manish Das S/O Hare Ram Das R/O Village- Bhatandi, Ward No. 09, P.S- Rosera, Distt.- Samastipur. 4.
Kabita Devi W/O Hare Ram Das R/O Village- Bhatandi, Ward No. 09, P.SRosera, Distt.- Samastipur. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioners :
Mr. Ajit Kumar, Advocate Mr. Dinkar Kumar, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Umeshanand Pandit, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 11-08-2025 Heard Mr. Ajit Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Mr. Umeshanand Pandit, learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 137(2) and 96 of the B.N.S..
3. As per prosecution case, it is alleged that all the F.I.R. named accused person, including these petitioners and 4 to 5 unknown persons, kidnapped daughter of informant for the purpose of marriage.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39496 of 2025(3) dt.11-08-2025 2/3 behalf of the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. As a matter of fact, during course of investigation, the victim was recovered and her statement was recorded under Section 183 of the B.N.S.S. wherein she has denied the factum of kidnapping and has categorically stated that she was in love with Petitioner No. 1 and she left her house out of her own sweet will and solemnized marriage with Petitioner No. 1 in Haryana. Petitioners claim clean antecedents.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, statement of victim recorded under Section 183 of the B.N.S.S. and clean antecedents of the petitioners, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is allowed.
7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Rosera, District- Samastipur in connection with Rosera P.S. Case No. 03
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39496 of 2025(3) dt.11-08-2025 3/3 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S..
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T