Ranjay Kumar Madhukar @ Jitan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36632 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-34 Year-2017 Thana- PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPatna ====================================================== Ranjay Kumar Madhukar @ Jitan (male) aged about 28 years Son of Late Ram Prasad Manoranjan Resident of Village - Koeri Bari, P.S.- Kotwali, District - Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Kumari Lacky Raj (female) aged about 28 years, Wife of Ranjay Kumar Madhukar D/O- Pramod Kumar, Resident of Moh. - Guru Market Karbigahiya, P.O.- G.P.O., P.S.- Jakkanpur, District - Patna. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Binay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs.Veena Rani Prasad Mr. Prakash Chandra Jha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 6.

19-02-2020 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The petitioner, husband of opposite party no. 2, apprehends his arrest in Complaint Case No. 34(C) of 2017 registered for the offence under Sections 406, 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Earlier, vide order dated 14-08-2019, the matter was sent to Mediation Centre for settlement of dispute between the parties, but from perusal of Mediator's report dated 06-11-2019 (Flag 'D'), it appears that mediation has failed. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this juncture, the petitioner is ready to give maintenance amount of Rs. 2,000/- (two thousand) per month, starting from this month, to complainant/opposite party no. 2.

In view of the undertaking of learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is ready to give maintenance amount of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36632 of 2019(6) dt.19-02-2020 2/2 Rs. 2,000/- (two thousand) per month, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, let the above-named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bailbond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna in connection with Complaint Case No. 34(C) of 2017 on the following conditions:

"(1) Opposite party no. 2 would file an affidavit before the court below and bring on record her saving bank account number for its communication to the petitioner.

(2) Petitioner would deposit the aforesaid maintenance amount per month in the saving bank account of the opposite party no. 2.

(3) In case, the petitioner fails to deposit the maintenance amount for two consecutive months, the court below would be at liberty to cancel the bail-bond.

(4) Petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present, as directed by the Court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail-bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(5) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(6) The aforementioned payment will be subject to any order passed in matrimonial, maintenance or connected proceedings. The present order, in no way, will preclude the parties to resolve the issue otherwise."

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J.) anay U T